S & a PLUMBING v. Kimes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the testimony of a doctor was competent even though he was unaware that the claimant was being treated for a resolved injury which had occurred several years before the accident
• “The very foundation of an employee’s right to receive benefits under the self-executing system in Chapter 440 requires a healthcare provider to assess the injury, establish a causal connection to the workplace accident, and, communicate that information to the employer’s insurance carrier.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).