Stall v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, although Florida’s right to privacy is broader than federal right, the right to possess obscene material in the home does not equate to the right to sell it publicly
• “[assuming that the petitioners [who were alleged vendors of obscene materials] have vicarious standing to raise their customers’ privacy interest”
• “[a]ssuming that the petitioners [who were alleged vendors of obscene materials] have vicarious standing to raise their customers’ privacy interest”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).