Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 4/27/2007
Ward v. State
Citations
- 994 So. 2d 293
- 2007 WL 1228169
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the question is: \Did the defendant specifically seek out the prohibited images and did he [or she] have the ability to exercise dominion and control over those images?\
- considering presence of additional child pornography on computer in determining knowing possession of images discovered in temporary internet files
- finding sufficient evidence to support the defendant’s conviction under Alabama’s child pornography statute when (1) a forensic examination of the university computer at issue showed that the defendant had used that computer and had “reached out” for 288 images of child pornography; (2
- discussing federal and state opinions concerning possession of child pornography
- collecting cases and adopting such a requirement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Marsh v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2017-02-06· cited 530×
- C.B.D. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2011-12-16· cited 28×
- Gant v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2009-02-03· cited 26×
- People v. JOSEPHITISAppellate Court of Illinois· 2009-08-19· cited 19×
- Commonwealth v. DiodoroSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-08-23· cited 17×
- Bussell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-08-04· cited 14×
- State v. JensenCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-01-15· cited 14×
- People v. MarshColorado Court of Appeals· 2011-12-22· cited 14×
- People v. ScolaroAppellate Court of Illinois· 2009-05-29· cited 6×
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2008-10-30· cited 5×
- Robert Lee Gant v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2009-02-03
- Mizusawa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2010-08-27
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court· 1982-07-02· cited 2,505×
- Osborne v. OhioSupreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 897×
- Beck v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama· 1981-03-06· cited 434×
- United States v. Stuart RommNinth Circuit· 2006-07-24· cited 216×
- United States v. LaughmanFourth Circuit· 1980-04-11· cited 201×
- State v. CallahanWashington Supreme Court· 1969-10-02· cited 191×
- United States v. Bobby StatenD.C. Circuit· 1978-05-09· cited 187×
- United States v. TuckerTenth Circuit· 2002-09-16· cited 149×
- Clements v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama· 1979-01-26· cited 137×
- United States v. SimpsonTenth Circuit· 1996-08-19· cited 86×
- United States v. GrimesFifth Circuit· 2001-03-14· cited 80×
- Schenher v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals· 1956-08-14· cited 78×
- Sheffield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1997-03-21· cited 73×
- German v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1982-12-28· cited 70×
- Fuller v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama· 1952-05-15· cited 70×
- United States v. Robert Phillips and William Arnold Tolbert, Jr.Fifth Circuit· 1974-07-15· cited 65×
- Ex Parte EversSupreme Court of Alabama· 1983-06-10· cited 54×
- Freeman v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1982-03-12· cited 50×
- Ex Parte MutrieSupreme Court of Alabama· 1993-09-10· cited 47×
- United States v. Edward M. StulockEighth Circuit· 2002-10-25· cited 46×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.