Skip to main content

Ward v. State

Citations

  • 994 So. 2d 293
  • 2007 WL 1228169

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the question is: \Did the defendant specifically seek out the prohibited images and did he [or she] have the ability to exercise dominion and control over those images?\
  • considering presence of additional child pornography on computer in determining knowing possession of images discovered in temporary internet files
  • finding sufficient evidence to support the defendant’s conviction under Alabama’s child pornography statute when (1) a forensic examination of the university computer at issue showed that the defendant had used that computer and had “reached out” for 288 images of child pornography; (2
  • discussing federal and state opinions concerning possession of child pornography
  • collecting cases and adopting such a requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.