Russenberger v. Russenberger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “conclusory allegations in the pleadings and argument by counsel” are insufficient to place a party’s mental state in controversy
• \A parent's request for a psychological evaluation may well be an expression of that parent's vindictiveness and could have the effect of making the child a victim.\
• \A parent's request for a psychological evaluation may well be an expression of that parent's vindictiveness and could have the effect of making the child a victim.\
• “A parent’s request for a psychological evaluation may well be an expression of that parent’s vindictiveness and could have the effect of making the child a victim.”
• “A parent’s request for a psychological evaluation may well be an expression of that parent’s vindictiveness and could have the effect of making the child a victim.”
• “A trial judge has the discretion to order a psychological evaluation pursuant to chapter 61. In such a case, the judge need not comply with the requirements of rule 1.360.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).