Landingham v. Landingham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that former wife demonstrated substantial change in circumstances and that move would be in best interest of child even where former wife violated injunction by moving outside state with child
• explaining that trial court cannot modify child's custody to punish custodial parent
• reversing a change of custody after custodial mother moved from Florida to Colorado with the child in violation of an injunction
• reversing a change of custody after custodial mother moved from Flor ida to Colorado with the child in violation of an injunction
• “Changing a child’s custody is not a device to be used to obtain compliance with court orders.” (quoting Crippen v. Crippen, 508 So.2d 1339, 1340 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).