Fredman v. Fredman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an appellate court reviews a decision on relocation for an abuse of discretion, and competent substantial evidence must support the trial court's factual findings concerning the statutory factors for relocation
• affirming the trial court’s denial of relocation because the evidence indicated that the relocation was in the mother’s best interest but not the minor child’s
• upholding denial of request by mother to relocate children from Tampa to Texas over objection of their father because there was no showing that the proposed relocation would improve the children's school, family, or home life
• “To the extent that the mother is arguing that she has a fundamental light as a parent to decide where her children live, she must recognize that the father shares the same fundamental right.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).