· 3/27/1979
Ruscito v. F-Dyne Electronics Co.
Citations
- 177 Conn. 149
- 411 A.2d 1371
- 1979 Conn. LEXIS 726
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- prohibiting the introduction of evidence that conflicts with an exclusive written statement
- “[i]t is fundamental that interest is allowed on the ground of some contract express or implied to pay it, or as damage for the breach of some contract”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cotter, Loiselle, Bogdanski, Longo, Peters
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.