Skip to main content
· 3/27/1979

Ruscito v. F-Dyne Electronics Co.

Citations

  • 177 Conn. 149
  • 411 A.2d 1371
  • 1979 Conn. LEXIS 726

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • prohibiting the introduction of evidence that conflicts with an exclusive written statement
  • “[i]t is fundamental that interest is allowed on the ground of some contract express or implied to pay it, or as damage for the breach of some contract”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cotter, Loiselle, Bogdanski, Longo, Peters

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.