Skip to main content
· 3/16/1966

Osborne v. Locke Steel Chain Co.

Citations

  • 153 Conn. 527
  • 218 A.2d 526
  • 1966 Conn. LEXIS 557

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defining consideration as “a benefit to the party promising, or a loss or detriment to the party to whom the promise is made”
  • “director of a corporation has the burden of showing that any personal dealing with the corporation is fair, in good faith and for adequate consideration”
  • \An exchange of promises is sufficient consideration to support a contract.\
  • \An exchange of promises is sufficient consideration to support a contract.\
  • \An exchange of promises is sufficient consideration to support a contract\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: King, Murphy, Alcorn, House, Cotter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.