Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2/21/1973
Collins v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Citations
- 164 Conn. 369
- 321 A.2d 444
- 1973 Conn. LEXIS 937
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ‘‘[w]e assume no right to add a new term to a contract’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)
- in construing contract, court cannot disregard words used by parties or revise, add to, or create new agreement
- in construing contract, court cannot disregard words used by parties or revise, add to, or create new agreement
- “It is the general rule that competent persons shall have the utmost liberty of contracting and that their agreements, voluntarily and fairly made, shall be held valid and enforced in the courts.”
- “interpretation of a contract must be made in accordance with the terms employed in the instrument and a court cannot by that means disregard the words used by the parties or revise, add to, or create a new agreement”
- “interpretation of a contract must be made in accordance with the terms employed in the instrument and a court cannot by that means disregard the words used by the parties or revise, add to, or create a new agreement”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cotter, Shapiro, Loiselle, MacDonald, Bogdanski
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
68 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Peter-Michael, Inc. v. Sea Shell AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-03-31· cited 734×
- Sturman v. SochaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-08-09· cited 231×
- Barnard v. BarnardSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-02-27· cited 196×
- Water & Way Properties v. Colt's Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-08-09· cited 156×
- Saphir v. NeustadtSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1979-04-03· cited 146×
- Levine v. MasseySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-02-21· cited 144×
- McCutcheon & Burr, Inc. v. BermanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-05-07· cited 126×
- Wards Company, Inc. v. Stamford Ridgeway Associates and Trim Fashions, Inc., Stamford Ridgeway AssociatesSecond Circuit· 1985-05-03· cited 113×
- Robert Lawrence Associates, Inc. v. Del VecchioSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1979-06-19· cited 100×
- Conference Center Ltd. v. TRC—The Research Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-02-08· cited 99×
- Hatcho Corp. v. Della PietraSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-01-15· cited 96×
- Herbert S. Newman & Partners, P.C. v. CFC Construction Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-04-30· cited 96×
- Jay Realty, Inc. v. Ahearn Development CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-01-11· cited 75×
- Heyman v. CBS, INC.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1979-07-03· cited 68×
- Lonergan v. Connecticut Food Store, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1975-03-18· cited 67×
- Rostenberg-Doern Co. v. WeinerConnecticut Appellate Court· 1989-01-10· cited 65×
- Fidelity Bank v. KreniskyConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-10-01· cited 64×
- Pesino v. Atlantic Bank of New YorkSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-03-17· cited 59×
- Crews v. CrewsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-03-16· cited 55×
- Central New Haven Development Corporation v. La Crepe, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1979-04-03· cited 48×
Other cases named Collins v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.