Skip to main content
· 9/26/1985

Ruotolo v. Sherwin-Williams Co.

Citations

  • 622 F. Supp. 546
  • 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15544

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Fact that plaintiff stated in an affidavit that he “glanced” at the SPD was sufficient to preclude summary judgment.
  • plaintiff is entitled to recover only if he can establish that he lost disability benefits as a result of his reliance on deficiencies in summary plan description
  • plaintiff is entitled to recover only if he can establish that he lost disability benefits as a result of his reliance on deficiencies in summary plan description

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jos㉠A. Cabranes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.