· 9/26/1985
Ruotolo v. Sherwin-Williams Co.
Citations
- 622 F. Supp. 546
- 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15544
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Fact that plaintiff stated in an affidavit that he “glanced” at the SPD was sufficient to preclude summary judgment.
- plaintiff is entitled to recover only if he can establish that he lost disability benefits as a result of his reliance on deficiencies in summary plan description
- plaintiff is entitled to recover only if he can establish that he lost disability benefits as a result of his reliance on deficiencies in summary plan description
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Josã A. Cabranes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.