Pollock v. Castrovinci

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that where defendant employer and trustee had offered a lump sum benefit, pursuant to the plan’s termination, plaintiff could not both refuse that amount and also seek monetary damages on the claim
• even if defendants failed to send one or more documents, plaintiffs were not harmed by such failure
• “Prior to ERISA, pension plans commonly provided for a forfeiture of benefits in the event a former employee entered into competition with the sponsoring employer. ERISA . . . proscribes such practices”
• no prejudice shown by plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).