· 11/20/1996
Moriarity v. United Technologies Corp. Represented Employees Retirement Plan
Citations
- 947 F. Supp. 43
- 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18468
- 1996 WL 711327
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “the plaintiff is entitled to recover only if he can establish that he lost his disability benefits as a result of his reliance on the deficiencies in the summary plan description”
- “A colorable claim is one that is arguable .... ” (internal quotation marks omitted)
- defining term “ambiguous” as “susceptible to more than one meaning”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dorsey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.