Skip to main content
· 11/20/1996

Moriarity v. United Technologies Corp. Represented Employees Retirement Plan

Citations

  • 947 F. Supp. 43
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18468
  • 1996 WL 711327

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “the plaintiff is entitled to recover only if he can establish that he lost his disability benefits as a result of his reliance on the deficiencies in the summary plan description”
  • “A colorable claim is one that is arguable .... ” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • defining term “ambiguous” as “susceptible to more than one meaning”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dorsey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.