Skip to main content
· 7/20/2011

Rundquist v. VAPIANO SE

Citations

  • 798 F. Supp. 2d 102
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78781
  • 2011 WL 2881333

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ordering discovery when evidence of defendant’s “licensing, franchising, or similar agreements” with other defendants could establish personal jurisdiction
  • allowing a plaintiff discovery when the defendants appeared to use a multi-layered corporate structure to avoid jurisdiction despite the fact “there [was] evidence of a cross-over of senior management” between the defendant and other related corporate entities

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beryl A. Howell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.