Gurley v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that defendant had no duty to warn because the plaintiff \had read and understood the warnings\ and had even informed a friend that the product — a motorcycle — was not built for two people
• “The objective of placing a duty to warn on the manufacturer of a product is to acquaint the user with a danger of which he is not aware, and there is no duty to warn when the danger is obvious.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).