Sears, Roebuck & Co., Inc. v. Haven Hills Farm, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that proof of a tire blow-out on a four and one-half month old tire was not, by itself, sufficient to prove defect in product
• “The burden of proof rests with the injured consumer to prove that the product left the defendant's control in an unreasonably dangerous condition not fit for its expected use, and that which rendered the product in such an unfit condition in fact caused the injury.”
• “The burden of proof rests with the injured consumer to prove that the product left the defendant’s control in an unreasonably dangerous condition not fit for its expected use, and that which rendered the product in such an unfit condition in fact caused the injury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).