Rucker v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that the facts known to the officer did not give rise to probable cause to arrest for loitering and prowling
• “[A]ny suspicion created by Mr. Rucker’s allegedly unsatisfactory answers to the deputies’ questions is irrelevant in the probable cause determination because there was no alarm that Mr. Rucker needed to dispel.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Mills v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-04-27· cited 11×
• P.R. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-09-27· cited 11×
• M.R. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-11-14· cited 5×
• Ferguson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-07-21· cited 4×
• S.K.W. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-05-17· cited 4×
• McClamma v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-05-09· cited 3×
• Benny Saintil v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-03-26

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• E.C. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-01-27· cited 27×
• C.H.S. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-09-26· cited 20×
• R.M. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-04-07· cited 11×
• Grant v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-09-03· cited 9×
• W.A.E. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-04-19· cited 8×