Grant v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “standing late at night in the back of a closed business in a high-crime area in which there had been burglaries does not without more, amount to the crime of loitering and prowling.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• G.G. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-06-15· cited 18×
• E.F. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-03-20· cited 10×
• Rucker v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-03-08· cited 7×
• M.R. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-11-14· cited 5×
• J.M.C. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-05-23· cited 5×
• S.K.W. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-05-17· cited 4×
• GG v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-06-15
• LU JING v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2021-04-28
• Mash v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-12-30

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Terry v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
• State v. Ecker
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1975-02-19· cited 174×
• E.C. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-01-27· cited 27×
• Springfield v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-01-22· cited 25×
• K.R.R. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-01-05· cited 24×
• C.H.S. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-09-26· cited 20×
• Von Goff v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-02-05· cited 13×
• Freeman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-04-28· cited 12×
• R.M. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-04-07· cited 11×
• Erceg v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-07-31· cited 1×