R.M. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding defendant's inconsistent and puzzling answers to officer's questions were irrelevant because there was no need for defendant to dispel any alarm

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Rinehart v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-12-29· cited 9×
• Grant v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-09-03· cited 9×
• J.D.H. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-11-16· cited 9×
• Rucker v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-03-08· cited 7×
• Gonzalez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-10-23· cited 5×
• Ferguson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-07-21· cited 4×
• S.K.W. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-05-17· cited 4×
• B.A.O. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-01-11· cited 2×
• RM v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-04-07
• Bao v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-01-11
• JDH v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-11-16

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• K.R.R. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-01-05· cited 24×
• J.S.B. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-03-17· cited 19×
• W.A.E. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-04-19· cited 8×