Rowe v. Akin & Flanders, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the economic loss rule did not apply to a negligent construction claim seeking recovery for a collapsed parking lot
• holding that the economic loss rule did not apply to a negligent construction claim seeking recovery for a collapsed parking lot
• where incomplete exercise of discretion based on erroneous theory of law, judgment vacated and case remanded with direction for trial court to consider proper test
• where incomplete exercise of discretion based on erroneous theory of law, judgment vacated and case remanded with direction for trial court to consider proper test
• plaintiffs’ parking area deteriorated and collapsed due to defendant’s negligent paving work
• case remanded to trial court to apply proper analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).