· 3/11/1976
Backus v. Chilivis
Citations
- 224 S.E.2d 370
- 236 Ga. 500
- 1976 Ga. LEXIS 917
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- third-party beneficiaries may only sue in their names where it clearly appears from the contract that it was intended for their benefit
- third-party beneficiaries cannot enforce contract unless it clearly appears from the contract that it was intended for their benefit
- third party beneficiaries cannot enforce contract unless it clearly appears from the contract that it was intended for their benefit
- “In order for a third party to have standing to enforce a contract!,] • • • it must clearly appear from the contract that it was intended for his benefit.”
- “In order for a third party to have standing to enforce a contract[,] . . . it must clearly appear from the contract that it was intended for his benefit.”
- in order for third-party beneficiary to have standing to enforce a contract, it must clearly appear in the contract’s terms that it was intended for her benefit; merely because she could benefit from its performance is insufficient
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ingram
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.