Skip to main content
· 8/13/2007

At&T Mobility, LLC v. National Ass'n for Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc.

Citations

  • 494 F.3d 1356
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 19182
  • 2007 WL 2297832

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a court is required to sua sponte consider whether a party has standing to bring the case
  • noting that courts must “consider standing sua sponte even if the parties have not raised the issue”
  • explaining that courts “are obliged to consider standing sua sponte even if the parties have not raised the issue”
  • explaining that a court is required to sua sponte consider whether a party has standing to bring a case
  • explaining that a court is required to sua sponte consider whether a party has standing to bring a case
  • deciding whether a \non-party\ had suffered an injury in fact by looking to whether it had a \legally protected interest\ that was invaded

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edmondson, Carnes, Fay

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.