Skip to main content
· 5/4/1999

Rouse v. Stanke (In Re Stanke)

Citations

  • 234 B.R. 449
  • 1999 Bankr. LEXIS 497
  • 1999 WL 288449

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that intent to defraud may be proven by circumstantial evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jerry Venters

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.