Eastern Diversified Distributors, Inc. v. Matus (In Re Matus)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying discharge for, among other things, the debtor’s failure to disclose ownership of a business
• denying discharge despite the debtors’ “several amendments to his Schedules and Statement of Financial Affairs after the meeting of creditors” where the amended documents still suffered from “significant omissions” and “inaccuracies”
• “[Deliberate omissions from schedules or the statement of financial affairs may also constitute false oaths or accounts.”
• “The plaintiff bears the burden of proving that the false oath or account was made knowingly and fraudulently about a material matter.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).