Layne v. Layne

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• exploring the level of specificity required to plainly indicate the elimination of a status as beneficiary
• husband's designation of former wife as beneficiary of his Keough pension plan did not affect equitable distribution of the pension plan assets

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Estate of Easterday Appeal of: Easterday
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-10-03· cited 7×
• In re Estate of Hoffman
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-10-01· cited 7×
• Wasserman v. Schwartz
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2001-09-14· cited 6×
• Manufacturers Life Insurance Ex Rel. North American Life Assurance Co. v. Dougherty
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1997-12-11· cited 4×
• Kirsop v. Public School Employes' Retirement Board
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-03-07· cited 3×
• Prudential v. Cushman
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-08-21
• Wichek v. Wichek
  Monroe County Court of Common Pleas· 2006-03-29

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Allegheny County v. Monzo
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-11-13· cited 79×
• Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. Stitzel
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-05-07· cited 29×
• Pato v. Cernuska
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-05-24· cited 18×
• Roth v. Roth
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-02-10· cited 6×