Skip to main content
· 8/31/2010

Roth v. Comerica Bank

Citations

  • 799 F. Supp. 2d 1107
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 143404
  • 2010 WL 6982510

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In 8 measuring the amount in controversy, a court must assume that the allegations of the 9 complaint are true and that a jury will return a verdict for plaintiff on all claims made in 10 the complaint.”
  • “In measuring the amount in controversy, a court must assume that the allegations of the complaint 28 1 On July 31, 2020, CFN removed the action to federal court based on diversity 2 jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. (Notice of Removal, ECF No. 1.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Margaret M. Morrow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.