Skip to main content
· 1/25/2011

Coleman v. Estes Express Lines, Inc.

Citations

  • 631 F.3d 1010
  • 17 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 236
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 1538
  • 2011 WL 211206

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • listing, for example, a defendant’s citizenship or the amount in controversy
  • CAFA’s “use of the words ‘sought’ and ‘alleged,’ ” in subsections (aa) and (bb) indicates “that the district court is to look to the complaint rather than to extrinsic evidence”
  • “Congress was particularly concerned that' subject matter jurisdiction determinations be made quickly under CAFA”
  • “Further, the complaint seeks injunctive relief against, [the local defendant]. There is nothing in the complaint to suggest either that the injunctive relief sought is itself insignificant, or that [the local defendant] would be incapable of complying with an injunction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Scannlain, Fletcher, Clifton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.