Supreme Court of Minnesota· 8/16/1985
Rostad v. On-Deck, Inc.
Citations
- 372 N.W.2d 717
- 1985 Minn. LEXIS 1161
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- jurisdiction proper where solicitation was not done by nonresident defendant, but rather its distributor
- “In a commercial operation, sales are the most tangible contact with a jurisdiction.”
- following traditional minimum contacts analysis
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Yetka, Coyne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Unnamed caseEighth Circuit· 1991-12-02· cited 58×
- Juelich v. Yamazaki Mazak Optonics Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2004-06-24· cited 38×
- Hammann v. 1-800 Ideas. Com, Inc.D. Minnesota· 2006-09-07· cited 32×
- Stanek v. A.P.I., Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1991-08-27· cited 28×
- Real Properties, Inc. v. Mission Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1988-08-12· cited 27×
- Scott Rilley v. MoneyMutual, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2016-08-24· cited 25×
- Matter of Hibbing Taconite Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1988-11-22· cited 21×
- V.H. v. Estate of BirnbaumSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1996-02-16· cited 19×
- Marriage of Mahoney v. MahoneyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1988-12-13· cited 15×
- Marshall v. Inn on Madeline IslandCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2000-05-09· cited 14×
- Trident Enterprises International, Inc. v. Kemp & George, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1993-07-06· cited 14×
- Hoppe v. G.D. Searle & Co.D. Minnesota· 1988-03-25· cited 14×
- In Re Vitamins Antitrust LitigationDistrict of Columbia· 2003-07-07· cited 14×
- S.B. Schmidt Paper Co. v. a to Z Paper Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1990-03-13· cited 13×
- In Re Minnesota Asbestos LitigationSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1996-08-15· cited 13×
- Curtis v. Altria Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2010-12-28· cited 13×
- Stangel v. RuckerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-12-30· cited 12×
- Hanson v. JOHN BLUE CO., DIV. OF BURNLEY CORP.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-06-17· cited 12×
- Kohn v. La Manufacture Francaise Des Pneumatiques MichelinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1991-10-22· cited 11×
- Daher v. G.D. Searle & Co.D. Minnesota· 1988-09-09· cited 11×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1945-12-03· cited 18,588×
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court· 1980-01-21· cited 8,668×
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court· 1958-10-13· cited 7,025×
- Gray v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Illinois Supreme Court· 1961-06-14· cited 596×
- Arthur H. Aftanase v. Economy Baler Company, a CorporationEighth Circuit· 1965-04-02· cited 266×
- DeJames v. Magnificence Carriers, Inc.Third Circuit· 1981-07-09· cited 184×
- Dent-Air, Inc. v. Beech Mountain Air Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-04-22· cited 97×
- DeJames v. Magnificence Carriers, Inc.Supreme Court· 1981-11-30· cited 97×
- Vikse v. FlabySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-02-26· cited 73×
- Bean Dredging Corp. v. Dredge Technology Corp.Fifth Circuit· 1984-09-20· cited 57×
- Quentin Hedrick v. Daiko Shoji Co., Ltd., Osaka, and Pine Oak Shipping, S.A.Ninth Circuit· 1983-09-13· cited 56×
- Ford Motor Co. v. Atwood Vacuum MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Florida· 1981-01-08· cited 36×
- Herman Shanks v. Westland Equipment and Parts Company, Formerly Westland Trailer Co., an Oregon CorporationTenth Circuit· 1982-01-21· cited 23×
- Noel v. S. S. Kresge Co.Sixth Circuit· 1982-02-08· cited 20×
- Svendsen v. Questor Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa· 1981-04-15· cited 17×
- Rostad v. On-Deck, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-09-04· cited 7×
Other cases named Rostad v. On-Deck, Inc.
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.