District of Columbia· 7/7/2003
In Re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation
Citations
- 270 F. Supp. 2d 15
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding specific personal jurisdiction in Kansas under the “effects” test based on the defendant’s sale of price-fixed choline chloride products in Kansas over a four-year period
- applying Minnesota law and holding that court had conspiracy jurisdiction based on overt acts in furtherance of conspiracy in forum state
- finding specific personal jurisdiction in Kansas under the \effects\ test based on the defendant's sale of price-fixed choline chloride products in Kansas over a four year period
- applying the long-arm statute of the transferor forum in multidistrict litigation
- “[pjlaintiffs must establish personal jurisdiction ... by a preponderance of the evidence”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thomas F. Hogan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. LG Electronics, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 2016-07-21· cited 42×
- AEROFLEX WICHITA, INC. v. FilardoSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-04-27· cited 28×
- In Re Papst Licensing Gmbh & Co. Kg LitigationDistrict of Columbia· 2008-12-11· cited 25×
- Veney v. Starbucks Corp.District of Columbia· 2008-06-19· cited 13×
- Johnson v. Lumenos, Inc.District of Columbia· 2007-01-11· cited 7×
- Gibbs v. PrimelendingSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2011-06-16· cited 7×
- Heller v. Nicholas Applegate Capital Management, LLCDistrict of Columbia· 2007-07-26· cited 5×
- In Re Papst Licensing GMBH & Co. KG LitigationDistrict of Columbia· 2009-03-05· cited 2×
- Papst v. Konica-Minolta Photo Imaging, Inc.D.C. Circuit· 2008-12-11· cited 1×
- Papst Licensing Gmbh & Co. Kg v. Konica-Minolta Holdings Inc.District of Columbia· 2009-03-05
- State v. LG Elecs., Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 2016-07-21
- Investors Corp. of Vt. v. Bayer AGVermont Superior Court· 2005-08-03
- Giallela v. United Property Management, Inc.District of Columbia· 2024-11-08
Cites
36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1945-12-03· cited 18,588×
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court· 1985-05-20· cited 12,253×
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court· 1980-01-21· cited 8,668×
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court· 1958-10-13· cited 7,025×
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court· 1984-04-24· cited 6,200×
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court· 1987-02-24· cited 3,642×
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court· 1984-03-20· cited 3,198×
- Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court· 1962-04-30· cited 1,362×
- United States v. BestfoodsSupreme Court· 1998-06-08· cited 1,059×
- Lexecon Inc. v. Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & LerachSupreme Court· 1998-03-03· cited 670×
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Minneapolis Civic & Commerce Ass'nSupreme Court· 1918-06-10· cited 280×
- Far West Capital, Inc. And Steamboat Development Corp. v. Dorothy A. Towne and Fleetwood CorporationTenth Circuit· 1995-02-03· cited 232×
- Hunt v. Nevada State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1969-10-22· cited 128×
- Execu-Tech Bus. Sys., Inc. v. New Oji Paper Co. Ltd.Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-01-20· cited 126×
- Janmark, Inc. v. James T. Reidy and Dreamkeeper, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1997-12-24· cited 115×
- Grove Press, Inc. v. James J. Angleton, William E. Colby and Raymond RoccaSecond Circuit· 1981-09-09· cited 113×
- Robert C. McFarlane v. Esquire MagazineD.C. Circuit· 1996-01-30· cited 89×
- Vikse v. FlabySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-02-26· cited 73×
- Chrysler Corp. v. General Motors Corp.District of Columbia· 1984-08-29· cited 72×
- Shapiro, Lifschitz & Schram, P.C. v. HazardDistrict of Columbia· 1998-09-30· cited 70×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.