Marshall v. Inn on Madeline Island

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that there is a higher quality to the acts of nonresidents that reach into Minnesota to do business
• concluding that jurisdiction was proper because defendant directly solicited and sold goods to Minnesota residents
• noting that “entering into a contract with a Minnesota resident can justify the exercise of [personal] jurisdiction but only where the dispute involves the contract”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).