M.D. Alabama· 9/3/2002
Rossi v. Troy State University
Citations
- 330 F. Supp. 2d 1240
- 2002 WL 32627779
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- denying motion for reconsideration when plaintiff failed to submit evidence prior to entry of original order and failed to show good cause for the omission
- denying motion to reconsider where plaintiff failed to submit evidence prior to entry of order and failed to show good cause for the omission
- denying motion to reconsider where plaintiff failed to submit evidence in question prior to entry of order and failed to show good cause why he could not have done so
- rejecting reconsideration based on new deposition testimony because the plaintiff “failed to submit the evidence prior to the court’s [ruling] and failed to show good cause why he could not have done so”
- denying the motion to reconsider where the plaintiff failed to submit the evidence in question prior to the entry of the order and failed to show good cause why he could not have done so
- “Additional facts and arguments that should have been raised in the first instance are not appropriate grounds for a motion for reconsideration.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Albritton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Rueter v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.N.D. Alabama· 2006-07-18· cited 26×
- Gougler v. Sirius Products, Inc.S.D. Alabama· 2005-05-20· cited 25×
- Wheeles v. Nelson's Electric Motor ServicesM.D. Alabama· 2008-06-06· cited 12×
- Busby v. JRHBW REALTY, INC. D/B/A REALTYSOUTHN.D. Alabama· 2009-04-20· cited 8×
- Wallace v. HolderN.D. Alabama· 2012-03-01· cited 4×
- Perdue v. C. HAGER & SONS HINGE MFG., CO., INC.M.D. Alabama· 2005-11-01· cited 1×
- Stewart v. StateVermont Superior Court· 2017-12-18
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 58,760×
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 38,518×
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court· 1981-03-04· cited 15,585×
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court· 1985-06-28· cited 11,385×
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaEleventh Circuit· 1981-11-03· cited 11,375×
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-11-09· cited 8,430×
- John D. Chapman v. Ai TransportEleventh Circuit· 2000-10-12· cited 1,803×
- Combs v. Plantation PatternsEleventh Circuit· 1997-02-20· cited 987×
- Busby v. City of OrlandoEleventh Circuit· 1991-05-17· cited 806×
- Gertrude W. Abramson v. William Paterson College of New JerseyThird Circuit· 2001-08-03· cited 663×
- Shackelford v. Deloitte & Touche, LLPFifth Circuit· 1999-10-04· cited 492×
- Nancy Rojas v. State of FloridaEleventh Circuit· 2002-03-22· cited 450×
- Harbert International, Inc. v. JamesEleventh Circuit· 1998-10-14· cited 366×
- Van M. Hafford v. Larry Seidner, Warden, Lorain Correctional Institution, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and CorrectionSixth Circuit· 1999-07-12· cited 297×
- American Home Assurance Company v. Glenn Estess & Associates, Inc., D/B/A Sales Consultants of BirminghamEleventh Circuit· 1985-06-21· cited 277×
- Sussman v. Salem, Saxon & Nielsen, P.A.M.D. Florida· 1994-02-28· cited 188×
- Mays v. United States Postal ServiceEleventh Circuit· 1997-09-15· cited 166×
- Standard v. A.B.E.L. Services, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 1998-12-03· cited 128×
Other cases named Rossi v. Troy State University
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.