Gougler v. Sirius Products, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “litigants should not use motions to reconsider as a knee-jerk reaction to an adverse ruling”
• “litigants should not use motions to reconsider as a knee-jerk reaction to an adverse ruling”
• citation 2 Plaintiff additionally asserts that it was in error for the Magistrate Judge to consider Cochran’s Motion to Dismiss based on qualified immunity grounds pursuant to 12(b)(6
• “[I]n the FIFRA context, federal courts routinely distinguish between state-law claims based on failure to warn (which are preempted) and those based on design defects or manufacturing flaws (which are not).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).