Skip to main content

Ross v. State

Citations

  • 713 S.E.2d 438
  • 310 Ga. App. 326
  • 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 2124
  • 2011 Ga. App. LEXIS 558

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that when defendant failed to appeal trial court’s decision in a timely manner, he is thereafter bound by same
  • a void sentence is subject to res judicata and law-of-the-case rule, and a defendant is “not entitled to multiple bites at the apple”
  • “[A]ny issue that was raised and resolved in an earlier appeal is the law of the case and is binding on this Court[.]”
  • a void sentence is subject to res judicata and the law-of-the-case rule, and a defendant is “not entitled to multiple bites at the apple”
  • “any issue that was raised and resolved in an earlier appeal is the law of the case and is binding on this Court”
  • “[A]ny issue that was raised and resolved in an earlier appeal is the law of the case and is binding on this Court[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dillard, Smith, Mikell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

195 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.