Skip to main content

Coleman v. State

Citations

  • 700 S.E.2d 668
  • 305 Ga. App. 680
  • 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 2834
  • 2010 Ga. App. LEXIS 789

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • challenges to the procedure employed in imposing a sentence are not valid void- sentence claims
  • \This Court has a duty to inquire into its jurisdiction to review the errors alleged on appeal.\
  • because the defendant’s motion did not present a colorable claim of voidness, he is not entitled to appellate review of the trial court’s denial of his motion
  • because the defendant’s motion did not present a colorable claim of voidness, he is not entitled to appellate review of the trial court’s denial of his motion
  • because the defendant’s motion did not present a colorable claim of voidness, he is not entitled to appellate review of the trial court’s denial of his motion
  • because defendant’s claims of error “challenge only the procedures employed in imposing the sentence” entered on his guilty plea, they “do not raise a valid allegation that the sentence was void”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pope, Barnes, Blackburn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

64 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.