Skip to main content

Ross v. State

Citations

  • 680 S.E.2d 435
  • 298 Ga. App. 525

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming admission of copies of processed checks as a business record where defendant raised only foundational arguments and did not contend that the “NSF’ stamp on a check represented a conclusion or violated the confrontation clause
  • a document may be admissible upon the testimony of an officer or employee of a business that received the document that the recipient received, relied upon, and retained the document in the regular course of its business

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ellington, Johnson, Mikell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.