McKinley v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• satisfying the authentication requirement does not eliminate hearsay concerns
• satisfying the authentication requirement does not eliminate hearsay concerns

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bravo v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-05-28· cited 11×
• Hungry Wolf/Sugar & Spice, Inc. v. Langdeau
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2016-09-29· cited 6×
• Benson v. ASSET ACCEPTANCE, LLC
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-06-15· cited 2×
• Hite v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-03-27
• Hungry wolf/sugar & Spice, Inc. v. Richard Wayne Langdeau, Jr.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2016-09-29

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Rankin v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2004-11-22· cited 207×
• Clark v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1999-04-12· cited 167×
• Clark v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2002-05-28· cited 29×
• Fenimore v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1995-10-16· cited 13×
• Patterson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-08-03· cited 12×
• Ross v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-06-25· cited 11×
• Jackson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-07-09· cited 9×
• In the Interest of Hudson
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-09-24· cited 8×
• Olds v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-10-08· cited 7×
• Archer v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-04-16· cited 6×
• McGaha v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1996-05-15· cited 3×