Banks v. Echols

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because trial court had not ruled on appellant’s counterclaim prior to appeal, that issue was not ripe for appellate review and remained pending in the trial court
• party cannot rely on default judgment against one defendant to obtain judgment authorizing foreclosure against co-defendant who had denied complaint allegations and raised affirmative defenses to claims
• “this Court cannot address any issue on which the trial court did not rule”
• “[e]vidence of a debtor’s repeated late, irregular payments, which are accepted by the seller, creates a factual dispute as to whether a quasi new agreement was created under OCGA § 13- 4-4”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).