Roseberry v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “ ‘The admission or exclusion of evidence on the ground of relevance lies within the discretion of the trial court.’ ”
• the word “solely” in accusation charging defendant with making phone calls “solely” to harass the victim was mere surplusage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jones v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2005-11-07· cited 64×
• Carroll v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2002-05-02· cited 7×
• Broadnax-Woodland v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2004-02-18· cited 7×
• Eidson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-08-06· cited 7×
• Striplin v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-03-08· cited 5×
• Bridges v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-10-31· cited 3×
• McKinney v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2005-06-24· cited 2×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Carter v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1996-07-15· cited 27×
• Callaway v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-11-21· cited 15×
• McBride v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1992-01-08· cited 14×
• Wright v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-04-07· cited 10×
• Reese v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-12-08· cited 9×
• Muse v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1981-09-22· cited 8×
• Pierce v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1985-11-08· cited 4×