Broadnax-Woodland v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• allowing prior consistent statement to go out with the jury violated the continuing witness rule
• trial court erred in admitting police report into evidence, and allowing it to go out with the jury, over defendant’s continuing witness objection
• OCGA § 40-6-10 provides that, until December 21, 2003, the operator of a vehicle must have proof of insurance in the vehicle at all times
• the word “knowingly” in accusation charging defendant with driving without proof of insurance was mere surplusage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).