Supreme Court of Georgia· 11/7/2005
Jones v. State
Citations
- 622 S.E.2d 1
- 279 Ga. 854
- 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 3362
- 2005 Ga. LEXIS 771
- 2005 WL 2925937
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that because defendant did not raise any objection to the form of the verdict below, he waived any right to assert error in that regard on appeal
- “[I]f one crime is complete before the other takes place, the two crimes do not merge [as a matter of fact].”
- “[W]here one victim is robbed of multiple items in a single transaction, only one robbery is committed.”
- count of theft by taking car did not merge with count of armed robbery of keys to same car
- offenses were based on two distinct acts of taking occurring at different times
- offenses were based on two distinct acts of taking occurring at different times
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
57 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ledford v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2011-03-25· cited 99×
- Turner v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2008-01-08· cited 54×
- Buruca v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-03-14· cited 43×
- Fair v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2010-11-22· cited 40×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2008-09-22· cited 38×
- Hampton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2007-10-09· cited 38×
- Rivers v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2015-01-20· cited 35×
- Peterson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2008-06-30· cited 34×
- Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2006-10-02· cited 31×
- Loyd v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2011-01-10· cited 30×
- Fortson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2006-04-25· cited 29×
- Hall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-07-08· cited 26×
- Washington v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2009-06-15· cited 26×
- Pierce v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2009-11-23· cited 24×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-11-08· cited 23×
- John v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2007-10-09· cited 23×
- Woods v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-06-11· cited 22×
- Davenport v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2008-01-28· cited 21×
- Spiller v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2007-06-25· cited 18×
- Hillman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-02-26· cited 16×
Cites
33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 2002-06-24· cited 4,683×
- Malcolm v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1993-09-20· cited 1,049×
- Hance v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1980-06-24· cited 158×
- Collier v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1979-10-30· cited 136×
- Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1976-09-28· cited 116×
- Morgan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2002-05-28· cited 94×
- Creecy v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1975-11-06· cited 47×
- Painter v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1976-06-08· cited 42×
- Hewitt v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2003-11-10· cited 35×
- Owens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2005-01-21· cited 35×
- Bland v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1994-11-07· cited 35×
- Tesfaye v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2002-09-16· cited 34×
- Satterfield v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1981-11-24· cited 27×
- Ellison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2004-02-05· cited 21×
- Randolph v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-08-08· cited 21×
- Hutchins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1972-12-04· cited 20×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-09-22· cited 20×
- Flanigan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1998-03-02· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.