Skip to main content

Rose v. Rose

Citations

  • 390 N.E.2d 1056
  • 181 Ind. App. 98
  • 1979 Ind. App. LEXIS 1224

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing the attorney’s conduct1 as “unexplainable and inexcusable misfeasance and nonfeasance” while the client was “conscientious and diligent”
  • the general rule with regard to the negligence of the attorney being attributable to the client is tempered by Trial Rule 60(B)s rule that the facts and circumstances of the particular case are controlling
  • the general rule with regard to the negligence of the attorney being attributable to the client is tempered by Trial Rule 60(B)’s rule that the facts and circumstances of the particular case are controlling

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lowdermilk, Lybrook, Robertson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.