Skip to main content
· 4/12/1983

Fulton v. Van Slyke

Citations

  • 447 N.E.2d 628
  • 1983 Ind. App. LEXIS 2809

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • fact that trial court would not have abused its discretion in granting Ind.Trial Rule 60(B) motion does not mean - that denial of motion was abuse of discretion
  • repeated motions for new trial brought under Rule 1-060(B) are not favored; subsequent motions under such rule may be considered if they are supported by proper reasons not alleged in the first motion and if there exist equitable reasons for not having raised those reasons in the first motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller, Young, Conover

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.