· 4/12/1983
Fulton v. Van Slyke
Citations
- 447 N.E.2d 628
- 1983 Ind. App. LEXIS 2809
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- fact that trial court would not have abused its discretion in granting Ind.Trial Rule 60(B) motion does not mean - that denial of motion was abuse of discretion
- repeated motions for new trial brought under Rule 1-060(B) are not favored; subsequent motions under such rule may be considered if they are supported by proper reasons not alleged in the first motion and if there exist equitable reasons for not having raised those reasons in the first motion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Miller, Young, Conover
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.