California Court of Appeal· 6/19/1980
Rose v. Medtronics, Inc.
Citations
- 107 Cal. App. 3d 150
- 166 Cal. Rptr. 16
- 1980 Cal. App. LEXIS 1949
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that class' certification was improper because the claimants had “varying periods of use of the product, varying needs for its replacement, varying elements, of causation, varying degrees of injury, and varying amounts of damages”
- denying class action regarding allegedly defective pacemakers
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fleming
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re American Medical Systems, Inc. Pfizer, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 1996-02-15· cited 761×
- Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court· 1988-04-07· cited 622×
- Lockheed Martin Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 2003-03-03· cited 129×
- Toscano v. Greene MusicCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2004-12-02· cited 79×
- Clothesrigger, Inc. v. GTE Corp.California Court of Appeal· 1987-04-28· cited 76×
- Osborne v. Subaru of America, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1988-02-16· cited 74×
- Fuhrman v. California Satellite SystemsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1986-03-28· cited 67×
- Arthur v. ZearleySupreme Court of Arkansas· 1995-04-10· cited 48×
- Blakemore v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2005-05-06· cited 43×
- Khan v. Shiley Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1990-01-30· cited 37×
- Brown v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1984-02-10· cited 36×
- Canon U.S.A., Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1998-12-09· cited 27×
- Silva v. BlockCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1996-08-15· cited 21×
- Livingston Parish Police Jury v. ILLINOIS CENT. GULF R.Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1983-05-17· cited 18×
- Raye v. Medtronic Corp.D. Minnesota· 1988-10-19· cited 17×
- Burks v. WymerWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1983-07-08· cited 12×
- Baltimore Football Club, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1985-06-14· cited 12×
- In Re BCBG Overtime CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2008-06-13· cited 12×
- Grogan-Beall v. Ferdinand Roten Galleries, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1982-07-19· cited 11×
- Akkerman v. MECTA CORP., INC.California Court of Appeal· 2007-06-27· cited 11×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1971-05-10· cited 453×
- City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1974-09-06· cited 448×
- Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court· 1967-11-15· cited 412×
- La Sala v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court· 1971-10-21· cited 213×
- Weaver v. Pasadena Tournament of Roses Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court· 1948-10-28· cited 76×
- Bozaich v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1973-05-30· cited 54×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1975-10-10· cited 43×
- Yandle v. PPG Industries, Inc.E.D. Texas· 1974-12-31· cited 39×
- Rosenfeld v. A. H. Robins Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1978-07-03· cited 30×
- Stilson v. Reader's Digest Assn., Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1972-10-25· cited 25×
- Beckstead v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1971-12-02· cited 24×
- Causey v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.E.D. Virginia· 1975-03-28· cited 24×
- Hobbs v. Northeast Airlines, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1970-05-15· cited 18×
- Bartlett v. Hawaiian Village, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1978-12-19· cited 15×
- Diamond v. General Motors Corp.California Court of Appeal· 1971-09-30· cited 13×
- Marchesi v. Eastern Airlines, Inc.E.D. New York· 1975-09-16· cited 12×
- Altman v. Manhattan Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1978-08-11· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.