Rose v. Medtronics, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that class' certification was improper because the claimants had “varying periods of use of the product, varying needs for its replacement, varying elements, of causation, varying degrees of injury, and varying amounts of damages”
• denying class action regarding allegedly defective pacemakers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).