Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “subdivision (b)(1)(A) was not intended to permit class actions simply when separate actions would raise the same question of law,” and instead must be limited to instances when separate actions would risk incompatible standards of “required” conduct
• “In this case, a judgment that defendants were liable to one plaintiff would not require action inconsistent with a judgment that they were not liable to another plaintiff. By paying the first judgment, defendants could act consistently with both judgments.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).