Skip to main content

Clothesrigger, Inc. v. GTE Corp.

Citations

  • 191 Cal. App. 3d 605
  • 236 Cal. Rptr. 605
  • 1987 Cal. App. LEXIS 1631

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding application of California law was constitutionally permissible where defendant’s principal offices were in California and the allegedly fraudulent misrepresentations emanated from California

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kremer, Lewis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

51 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.