Skip to main content
· 6/9/2005

Rose v. Com.

Citations

  • 613 S.E.2d 454
  • 270 Va. 3
  • 2005 Va. LEXIS 57

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding “that the circuit court’s decision to admit evidence of the prior crime was indeed harmless error” because “[t]he evidence of Rose’s guilt is overwhelming”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hassell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.