· 11/4/2011
Anderson v. Com.
Citations
- 717 S.E.2d 623
- 282 Va. 457
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a fact finder may consider a witness’s prior consistent statements in assessing credibility
- recognizing Virginia’s - 12 - adherence to the principle that a fact finder may consider a witness’s prior consistent statements in assessing credibility
- holding a fact finder may consider a witness’s prior consistent statements in assessing credibility
- applying this test in the context of review of a bench trial
- applying this test in the context of review of a bench trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Charles S. Russell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.