Skip to main content
· 11/4/2011

Anderson v. Com.

Citations

  • 717 S.E.2d 623
  • 282 Va. 457

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a fact finder may consider a witness’s prior consistent statements in assessing credibility
  • recognizing Virginia’s - 12 - adherence to the principle that a fact finder may consider a witness’s prior consistent statements in assessing credibility
  • holding a fact finder may consider a witness’s prior consistent statements in assessing credibility
  • applying this test in the context of review of a bench trial
  • applying this test in the context of review of a bench trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Charles S. Russell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.