Scates v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing the conviction because the defendant’s admission that he “jammed” credit cards into doors in order to enter other homes was not admissible as demonstrative of a common “scheme of breaking into homes”
• reversing the conviction because the defendant's admission that he \jammed\ credit cards into doors in order to enter other homes was not admissible as demonstrative of a common \scheme of breaking into homes\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).