Rose Johnson v. Robert Hamrick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[d]eference is afforded the district court’s findings due to its special vantage point and ability to conduct an intensely local appraisal of the design and impact of a voting system”
• noting that “[d]eference is afforded the district court’s findings due to its special vantage point and ability to conduct an intensely local appraisal of the design and impact of a voting system”
• noting that “[d]eference is afforded the district court’s findings due to its special vantage point and ability to conduct an intensely local appraisal of the design and impact of a voting system”
• affording deference to the district court’s findings “due to its special vantage point and ability to conduct an intensely local appraisal of the design and impact of a voting system”
• affording deference to the district court’s findings “due to its special vantage point and ability to conduct an intensely local appraisal of the design and impact of a voting system”
• affording deference to the district court’s findings “due to its special vantage point and ability to conduct an intensely local appraisal of the design and impact of a voting system”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).