· 12/19/1996
Roscoe-Gill v. Newman
Citations
- 937 P.2d 673
- 188 Ariz. 483
- 232 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 22
- 1996 Ariz. App. LEXIS 286
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that 22 liquidated-damages provisions cannot be deemed unenforceable for being too low
- “When liquidated damages are specified in a contract, the terms of the contract generally control.”
- “The primary purpose of contractual liquidated damage provisions is to avoid the parties having to litigate, and courts or juries having to decide, what would be a fair and reasonable damage award in the event of a breach.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pelander, Druke, Livermore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.