Skip to main content
· 12/19/1996

Roscoe-Gill v. Newman

Citations

  • 937 P.2d 673
  • 188 Ariz. 483
  • 232 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 22
  • 1996 Ariz. App. LEXIS 286

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that 22 liquidated-damages provisions cannot be deemed unenforceable for being too low
  • “When liquidated damages are specified in a contract, the terms of the contract generally control.”
  • “The primary purpose of contractual liquidated damage provisions is to avoid the parties having to litigate, and courts or juries having to decide, what would be a fair and reasonable damage award in the event of a breach.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pelander, Druke, Livermore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.