Mining Investment Group, LLC v. Roberts

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that it is not the court’s role “to alter, revise, modify, extend, rewrite or remake an agreement” (quoting Goodman v. Newzona Inv. Co., 101 Ariz. 470, 472 (1966))
• failure to close on real estate transaction when “time is of the essence” is a material breach
• “When liquidated damages are specified in a contract, the terms of the contract generally control.” (quoting Roscoe-Gill, 188 Ariz. at 485)
• “It is well-established that ‘[a] contract for the sale of realty does not effect a transfer of legal title,’ which remains in the seller’s name until the close of escrow.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).